<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>Conspiracy Clinic from theVoiceofReason.com (and conspiracyclinic.com)</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
  <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com</link>
  <description>Our analysis of the great conspiracies of our time. From UFO's, the Da Vinci Code, the Bible Code, Marilyn Monroe's death and JFK... Shocking evidence. Amazing conspiracy points...



Note: this isn't updated that regularly...</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:58:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>ListGarden Program 1.02</generator>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <item>
   <title>Moon Hoax update: Cross hairs - evidence of photo manipulation</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.conspiracyclinic.com/moon.htm</link>
   <description>Updated with a new picture from the Apollo 11 mission where  cross hairs appear beneath an object. This picture must have been manipulated. What else have NASA manipulated?</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Evidence of Moon hoax cover up from NASA film...</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.conspiracyclinic.com/video/FunnyMoon/FunnyMoonHQ.htm</link>
   <description>This is simply amazing footage from the documentary A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon, by Bart Sibrel. 



In it the Apollo 11 mission team are faking a distant moon while they sit in a low earth orbit (because they didn't go to the moon). A stunning find and we would love to hear an explanation for this... Clip used with kind permission of Bart Sibrel.</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Bart Sibrel - Neil Armstrong won't swear he went to the moon...</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.conspiracyclinic.com/moon.htm</link>
   <description>OK so this might have been a stunt but Bart Sibrel is convinced the moon landings are a hoax, and, well, if Neil Armstrong won't swear he went, on the bible then why? Another interesting page for the conspiracy files...</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:44:02 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Moon conspiracy update - Pictures of erratic lighting on moon</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.conspiracyclinic.com/moon.htm</link>
   <description>Two new pictures put up, one can be explained away, the other can't...</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Moon Hoax - one claim added, one amended</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/moon.htm</link>
   <description>1) The shadows are wrong - pictures added to point 2

2) New point 18): NASA destroyed the original footage of the Apollo 11 moon landing - cock up or conspiracy?</description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>The Apollo Moon Missions - Apollo 11 </title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/video/NASA/Apollo11/Part1.htm</link>
   <description>Monday 20th July 2009 is the 40th anniversary of the first man to walk on the moon... allegedly, of course...



We have tidied up the official NASA Apollo 11 video and polished it up a little. Now in 500x400...</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:08:15 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>The Moon Landings Conspiracy - The Official NASA Mission Documentaries</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/video/NASA/index.html</link>
   <description>I've just put up a selection of NASA official documentaries. The films include live footage from Apollo 11, 12 15, 16 and 17. The quality of the images gets better as the series advances, so if you don't want to start at the beginning then start at 15 it is very good... </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Moon landing conspiracy - Irrefutable evidence they went?</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/moon.htm</link>
   <description>New point (17) We saw this on a BBC documentary last week. A set of mirrors was placed on the moon by Aldrin and Armstrong in 1969. It has been used ever since to measure the distance of the moon from the earth by scientists at the McDonald Observatory in Texas.</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Diana: VIDEO: Henry Paul Ties Shoelaces</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/DianaInquest/HenriPaulTiesShoelaces.htm</link>
   <description>Evidence presented at the inquest into the death of Diana and Dodi that Henri Paul was sober in the hours before driving the car that killed himself and Diana and Dodi.</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Diana: Ritz TV Camera shots, Published October 2007</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/DianaInquest/DianaDodiRitzHotelCameras2007.htm</link>
   <description>Video</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:34:22 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Diana: Pictures from the inquest into the death of Diana and Dodi</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/DianaInquest/Pictures.htm</link>
   <description>Pictures from the inquest, all high quality and large...</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:09:21 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Update: 9/11 Conspiracy page</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/911.htm</link>
   <description>We have started to rewrite this page. This is the first version. To comment on it please email editor@thevoiceofreason.com.</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Loose Change 2nd Edition, A Louder Than Words Production</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/video/LooseChange2ndEdition/index.html</link>
   <description>Loose Change 2nd Edition is the controversial internet conspiracy documentary that everyone is talking about. Whether you agree or disagree with the points, it's now firmly part of the debate.



As part of this debate theVoiceofReason.com presents the documentary in 14 parts, each indexed so that you can go straight to the conspiracy point you are interested in... </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:26:45 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>New sensational claims in Diana Crash investigation</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/DeathOfDiana1997.htm</link>
   <description>French officials could have mixed up driver Henri Paul's body with Dodi Fayed in the hours after the crash.</description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:39:28 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>911 - Controlled demolition 'evidence' and arguments</title> <meta name="author" content="editor@thevoiceofreason.com">
   <link>http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/911.htm</link>
   <description>Conspiracy 4b) We have seen arguments that the following footage shows a controlled explosion (video: wmv rm). We just don't see it that way. A controlled explosion would have required an explosion from the bottom, all this video shows is the tower collapsing from above. It is said that you can hear a large bang (the commentator refers to it) but that could easily have come from the beginning of the collapse at the top of the structure.



Conspiracy 4c) We have also heard arguments that the top-down collapse of the mainly steel Twin Towers can be compared to a controlled explosion of a brick and mortar building, as seen in this example (wmv rm). Trouble is, the Twin Towers did not collapse like the second controlled demolition example in this video. In the controlled demolition example the explosive charge is set at the base of the structure (you can't see it explode because there are buildings in the way), the explosion then sets in chain a domino type effect and the entire structure collapses in on itself. The Twin Towers collapsed from the top down, not bottom-up like in a controlled explosion. 



Conspiracy 4d) We have also heard it alleged that the secret services have hushed up satellite images which apparently show a heat source at Ground Zero, after the collapse of the building. The conspiracy says that it was this (additional) heat source that enabled the Twin Towers to collapse in the way that they did. However, following the high heat required to destroy the towers from the aircraft filled with fuel, we would expect to see a heat image following the collapse of the building, and don't see that this proves there was an additional heat source put there to create the controlled demolition.</description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>

