| WARNING
18 Funny review of U RATED PICTURE |
Studio executives summary / pitch
|
| Photogenic
merchandising figurines in big screen story - sequel to be in straight to Happy
Meal format.
|
Short plot
summary |
|
Monsters Inc
is a company which scares children to get the energy from their screams to convert
into energy. The
best scarer in the company, Blue and purple-fluffy Sulley, meets little girl (Boo)
who is not scared of him. Sulley and Mike Wazowski (green one-eyed monster) attempt
to get her back through the door from which she has escaped, but are hindered
by the machinations of bad monster Randall who sounds irritatingly like Sherman
in American Pie. |
Rating |
| Universal,
suitable for all - includes monsters, some comic violence, warehouse machinery
and swinging from heights |
What our
panel of critics thought (Continued) |
"Hey, I don't
remember Monsters scaring children in the movies. In my day they concentrated
on scantily clad teen girls. Kids just grow up so fast these days.""A
horribly distasteful paedophilia type movie, if it wasn't for our hero's blue
and purple fluffy exterior I feel sure there would have been convictions.""Never
trust a man in a suit with eight claws as legs.""The
old Addams Family joke reworked for a whole new generation.""Been
there, bought the bendy toy, bought the happy meal, saw the movie at the cinema,
bought the DVD, bought the book, lost the book, bought the book again, bought
the DVD with the extra special super premium content they brought out 6 months
later, went to the web site, downloaded the screen saver, bought the computer
game for both the PC and PS2, bought the VHS just in case the DVD ever broke,
bought the breakfast cereal, ate the breakfast cereal, tried a new breakfast cereal
I would never have tried before had a character from this movie not been on the
front, bought the jewellery, bought the Monster Incs masks and makeup kit, did
everything in fact other than kidnap a child.""So,
human children are highly toxic? They never tell you this at school, is it a cover
up?""It's
the merchandising that annoys me so. When they brought out Jaws, had McDonalds
done a happy meal of that we all would have been too frightened to ask for one!
Damn the kids today." |
Please
tell me the ending |
| In
an attempt to cover up the disappearance of Boo, and the bad publicity it would
bring, the owner of the company, Waternoose, catches her with the intention of
killing her. Sulley
and Mike save Boo and return her to her house. The door is then 'shredded' to
prevent any further problems. Sulley has a splinter from the door and manages
to secretly go back to see her... "Kitty!" |
What snack
should I eat while watching this movie? |
|
Anything sweet
and chewy that you don't mind breaking a tooth over as they will soon be replaced
with a new set. |
Alternative
version suggestions |
|
A Middle Eastern
version. |
Could this
be made into an adult live action movie? |
| Yes
the cast of Friends in monster suits. |
Could this
film be improved with more group hugs? |
|
There is far
too much niceness in this movie. As if making monsters acceptable to a whole new
generation of consumers wasn't bad enough, it really is taking the piss to see
them hugging like that. |
Would the
scary bits make your cat jump out of your lap causing scratch marks? Would your
dog like it? Other pets? |
|
Family pets
of the fluffy kind will resent the super fluffiness of Sulley who never has one
of those unsightly damp patches that pets with such hair always have. Dogs
could well sleep throughout the movie, whilst cats will dream of holding a frying
pan in their front paws which they will slam straight into the dog's head with
perfect timing. Pet
voles or moles could attempt to escape through the window during this movie. |
What can
I take from this movie to make me a better person? |
| There's
only one thing better than making money from your image rights, that's having
a bendy collectible toy made in your likeness. You may never have to work a day
for the rest of your life after exposure like this. |
How much
would you pay for a copy of this movie in goods. |
| A
small untrainable dwarf dog. |
Does the
film attempt technobabble? If so does this succeed? |
| The
basic premise of the movie is that children's doors are somehow linked by technology
(or whatever) so that monsters can go to work in one place so that children's
doors can be delivered to them, thus making the monstering experience more efficient.
This conceit takes monstering to shameful new levels of productivity. |
Other comments
|
| A
harmless movie which will probably make children slightly less scared of monsters.
This could be a bad thing if you are using this to keep them off the roof, still,
hey this is a market economy and there was money to be made. Whilst
most Hollywood main stream cinema today is focused on making a turn on the investment,
there can be fewer movies more designed for sell through marketing than this movie.
Shame the story still needs a bit more to it. It
is a simple tale told using nice characters. Still not a patch on Toy Story which
is brilliant. |
Date
of this review |
| October
5 , 2002 |