Studio executives summary / pitch
|
| OK.
I've got this guaranteed, no question in my mind whatsoever, idea, that is absolutely
guaranteed to piss everyone off somehow... |
Short plot
summary |
|
Set
in an uncertain time, but sometime in the future, in England. Alex
(Malcom McDowell) is a young offender who chooses to be cured by mind control
whilst in prison - convicted for an extremely sick/violent rape/murder. He is
conditioned to be repulsed by sex, violence and, for some reason, Beethoven's
Ninth Symphony. The
movie begins by studying a violent youth alternate-class (droogs) who have adopted
their own method of language, engage in ultra violence and a 'bit of the in-out'
(sex). |
Rating |
| Adults
only. Contains moments of extreme (ultra) sexual violence, bright colors, padded
out underpants on the outside of trousers, strange words, sinister eye-care. |
What our
panel of critics thought |
|
"A
media studies student's wet dream of a movie. As close to a pretentious art house
orgasm that it is possible to get but still remaining dry afterwards." |
Please
tell me the ending
|
| On
being released from prison after 'treatment', Alex finds an unforgiving society,
even though he is now 'cured' from his criminal impulses. Unable to live at home,
he is forced out on the streets. A
down-and-out recognizes him. Saving him from the other homeless, two police officers,
who originally were part of Alex's droogie crime-circle whom he had betrayed,
take him for a beating. Staggering
from the beating he received, he comes upon the house where he had earlier broken
into to viciously rape a woman and beat a man for no reason in particular. Whilst
he initially does not recognize him (Alex wore a mask and a long pointy nose during
the attack) the man eventually realizes it is Alex when he sings 'Singing in the
rain' - the song sung while he committed the attacks. Alex is drugged and, whilst
having Beethoven played to him as torture, jumps from a window as he tries to
'snuff it.' He survives and ends up in hospital. By
this time, attitudes to the mind control he has been through has led to a policy
change in the government and the minister attempts to ingratiate himself with
Alex - Alex is now the victim - the man whose wife he had killed is 'put away'
and no expense spared to set Alex up for life again... |
Quotable
quotes (real) |
|
"Shut
your filthy hole you scum." |
Justify this movie's existence in the classic strand. From
theVoiceof Reason.com's Veritable Cornucopia
|
| A
triumph of horribility. A nasty-vicious scab of a movie which one cannot stop
oneself from picking at to make it bleed profusely upon the carpet of all our
comfortable well beingnesses. A stunning masterpiece of domestic horror. Oh!
the differing languages of youth, determined to etch their mark amongst peers
by communicating via a special melody. Of a mind controlling police state willing
to tweak the eye balls in their sockets of the young to prevent their continuance
along the road of naughty offenditude. I
have, many a time in these volumes, expressed my complete bewitched enthusiasm
for all of Kubrick's quintessential creations. This movie has triumphantly nothing
of pleasure to offer it's viewers - Kubrick, the genius, has this time put nothing
upon the stick of enticement other than a rotten carrot to lead us forwards! The
movie is truly nasty in places: I had to watch the entire 9th series of Friends
again before the feeling came back to my goodwill to mankind muscles. Any TV scheduler
who puts this movie on straight after It's a Wonderful
life should be sent to bed without supper in my opinion. |
If I were to watch this at home how best should I sit? |
| In
full droog uniform, including a stick. |
Could this
movie be improved with more violent eyecare? |
| This
movie did for going to the opticians what the Marathon Man did for dentistry.
Short of poking someone slowly in the eye with something red hot, not really.
|
Would your
pets enjoy this movie? |
|
Dogs,
of course, will enjoy the rough and tough nature of the droogs, or at least will
be impressed that they seem to have their walking boots on. Cats
will find the movie distressing as at least two cat-loving type women are attacked
mindlessly. Tortoises
and turtles enjoy the movie for the droogs headgear. Actually, they like any movie
with bowler hats in them as they dream of perching themselves on the heads of
people and flying through the air... |
What
our panel of critics thought
|
| "A
media studies student's wet dream of a movie. As close to a pretentious art house
orgasm that it is possible to get but still remaining dry afterwards."
"A
wholesome piece of family entertainment. NOT!" "This
movie could not be made more uncomfortable even if I stuck a wriggling porcupine
up my ass." "I
always got that reaction to Beethoven's Ninth too, my dear." "Bitch,
get this art house English shit off my television NOW. Fix me a Scooby snack with
meat and pickles in or I'll smack someone." "One
of those few movies that make even less sense if you watch the subtitles. A joy!" "Nightmares
assured the next time a stranger in a bowler hat with his underpants on over his
trousers, with a long pointy false nose and eye-mask knocks at your door." |
What snack
should I eat while watching this movie? |
|
Baked
beans on toast with a whole roast chicken garnish. |
What can
I take from this movie to make me a better person?
|
| Shit
happens dude... |
Estimate
number of minutes of full on full frontal nudity in this movie. |
| 5
horror filled minutes + 10 minutes of almost nudity. |
How much would
you pay for a copy of this movie in goods? |
| A
miniature musical bowler hat which plays 'Singing in the Rain' when poked. |
Does this
movie attempt overly complex strangeness? If so does it succeed. |
| There
are times (examples: where the attacked man cross-examines Alex while giving him
drugged wine, and, earlier, when a strange man talks to Alex in his bedroom) when
there seems to be a strangeness overload - yes, to Art House screeching proportions
but without the expressive hand movements. |
Would this movie win awards for performances of the f-word? |
| The
word is not used. A whole new language of sorta-English is used whereby 'youth'
converses with each other. |
Other comments |
| Stanley
Kubrick had this movie effectively banned in England following a string of apparently
similar attacks (he would sue anyone who showed it). This is a horrible thought.
It was released immediately on his death... The
movie is a very uncomfortable one, but one that makes very astute observations
about how our society could (did?) evolve. Not a feel good movie in the slightest,
and at the end even then the viewer is not let off the hook. |
Date of review |
| December
3 , 2002 |