The
White House astrologers who unanimously recommended an invasion
of Iraq in March 2003 based on the planetary configuration
as it then was known, have told this web site that, had
they known about the existence of the three 'new' planets,
Ceres, Charon and 'Xena', they would
never have recommended the invasion in the first place.
Marvin
'The Mystic', one of the astrologers who gave the White
House his advice on Iraq as far back as 2002, told this
web site:
"In
early 2003, Ceres transected the Scorpionian plain
of the Aresian parabola just at the wrong moment. This
means that a March 2003 invasion presented vastly more
problems than the limited problems we foresaw with Pluto
transecting the Neptunion hyper-cloud, which was the state
of the planets as we then knew."
"Now
we know about these three new planets it does make you
question the wisdom of going ahead with the land-based
invasion that the US preferred at the time."
He
goes on:
"If
you look particularly at the plane of 'Xena' in
March 2003, really it is quite amazingly retrograde to
the aspherical luminescence of Neptune and, looking back
on it, I have no doubt in my mind that the White House
astrologers would not have recommended invasion knowing
what we know now."
-x-x-x-
Coming
up after the break: Was NASA to blame for the Iraq invasion?
Why didn't NASA tell the White House astrologers of the
other three planets then? Another case of one government
body not sharing their knowledge with another?
Read
Your Funny Horoscopes for August here..
